Strategic Human Resource Management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Strategic Human Resource Management - Essay ExampleThis method of providing feedback has give-up the ghost quite popular because of the various benefits associated with it if it is carried out in the right manner, but still there be certain limitations associated with this method.The initiation of the process of 360-degree feedback starts when a particular leader perceives that he/she needs to further their exploitation in order to meet the changing needs of the organization (Atwater, 2007, p.287). This means that the main purpose of conducting this direct of per establishance judgement is the purpose of development. This means that organizations that are implementing this feedback should focus on the developmental aspect associated with this form of feedback instead of focusing on the administration purpose of performance appraisal.Before implementing this performance appraisal method, organizations should satisfy into consideration the current health of the organization. If t he organization is going through the process of cutting cost and is fall their workforce, they should avoid using this form of appraisal as during such a situation organizations may travel to obtain objective information since employees will be trying to protect their own interests and jobs.Commitment towards the appraisal process is very essential and it is the job of the human resource departments to obtain commitment for the appraisal system. barely the HR department is not only responsible for gaining commitment they have to align other roles and duties along with acquiring commitment. This is because if the process is not associated with other roles, then the participants of the process may lose commitment and would set the process to be waste. According to Atwater, a research was conducted in which 19% of the surveyed organizations reported that if the 360-degree feedback system is not connected with human resource development practices, the participants who are being eval uated